Back to Search

C v D and E: 2501327/2018

Employment Tribunal

Published on 06 March 2020, 13:58

Summary
Employment Tribunal decision.
categories
sex-discrimination unfair-dismissal working-time-regulations
country
england-and-wales
decision date
2020-01-08

Official Documents

Change History

  • First published.

Full Decision Text

Raw text extracted from the official documents.

Case Number: 2501327/2018 1 THE EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: C Respondents: D (First Respondent) E (Second Respondent) Heard at: Teesside Justice Centre On: Monday 6 January 2020 Before: Employment Judge Shore Mrs D Winter Mrs S Mee Representation: Claimant: In Person Respondents: First Respondent No Appearance Second Respondent In Person JUDGMENT 1. The first respondent was dissolved on 1 October 2019 and, as a result, the tribunal has no jurisdiction to hear any claim against it, so all claims against the first respondent are struck out in their entirety pursuant to Rule 37(1)(a) of Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution & Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 (“the 2013 Rules”). EMPLOYMENT JUDGE SHORE JUDGMENT SIGNED BY EMPLOYMENT JUDGE ON 6 January 2020 Public access to employment tribunal decisions Judgments and reasons for the judgments are published, in full, online at www.gov.uk/employmenttribunal- decisions shortly after a copy has been sent to the claimant(s) and respondent(s) in a case. Case Number: 2501327/2018 1 THE EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: C Respondent: E Heard at: Teesside Justice Centre On: Monday 6 January, Tuesday 7 January and Wednesday 8 January 2020 Before: Employment Judge Shore Mrs D Winter Mrs S Mee Representation: Claimant: In Person Respondent: In Person JUDGMENT 1. The claimant’s claim of unfair dismissal fails as she was employed by a limited company that is dissolved, not E. The judgment given in court was in error and has been reconsidered by me of my own motion. 2. The claimant’s claim of direct sex discrimination fails. 3. The claimant’s claim of harassment contrary to sections 26(1) and 26(2) of the Equality Act 2010 succeeds. The respondent will pay the claimant an award for injury to feelings of £16,000.00. 4. The claimant’s claim of unauthorised deduction of wages fails because she was employed by a limited company that is dissolved, not E. The judgment given in court was in error and has been reconsidered by me of my own motion. 5. The only judgment that can be made in favour of the claimant against the respondent is the award for injury to feelings. Case Number: 2501327/2018 2 EMPLOYMENT JUDGE SHORE JUDGMENT SIGNED BY EMPLOYMENT JUDGE ON 8 January 2020 Public access to employment tribunal decisions Judgments and reasons for the judgments are published, in full, online at www.gov.uk/employmenttribunal- decisions shortly after a copy has been sent to the claimant(s) and respondent(s) in a case.

Related Parties

Search the database for other cases involving these individuals or companies.