C v D and E: 2501327/2018
Employment Tribunal
Published on 06 March 2020, 13:58
- Summary
- Employment Tribunal decision.
- categories
-
sex-discrimination unfair-dismissal working-time-regulations
- country
- england-and-wales
- decision date
- 2020-01-08
Change History
-
First published.
Full Decision Text
Raw text extracted from the official documents.
Case Number: 2501327/2018
1
THE EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Claimant: C
Respondents: D (First Respondent)
E (Second Respondent)
Heard at: Teesside Justice Centre On: Monday 6 January 2020
Before: Employment Judge Shore
Mrs D Winter
Mrs S Mee
Representation:
Claimant: In Person
Respondents: First Respondent No Appearance
Second Respondent In Person
JUDGMENT
1. The first respondent was dissolved on 1 October 2019 and, as a result, the
tribunal has no jurisdiction to hear any claim against it, so all claims against the
first respondent are struck out in their entirety pursuant to Rule 37(1)(a) of
Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution & Rules of Procedure)
Regulations 2013 (“the 2013 Rules”).
EMPLOYMENT JUDGE SHORE
JUDGMENT SIGNED BY EMPLOYMENT
JUDGE ON
6 January 2020
Public access to employment tribunal decisions
Judgments and reasons for the judgments are published, in full, online at www.gov.uk/employmenttribunal-
decisions shortly after a copy has been sent to the claimant(s) and respondent(s) in a case.
Case Number: 2501327/2018
1
THE EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Claimant: C
Respondent: E
Heard at: Teesside Justice Centre On: Monday 6 January, Tuesday 7
January and Wednesday 8
January 2020
Before: Employment Judge Shore
Mrs D Winter
Mrs S Mee
Representation:
Claimant: In Person
Respondent: In Person
JUDGMENT
1. The claimant’s claim of unfair dismissal fails as she was employed by a limited
company that is dissolved, not E. The judgment given in court was in error and
has been reconsidered by me of my own motion.
2. The claimant’s claim of direct sex discrimination fails.
3. The claimant’s claim of harassment contrary to sections 26(1) and 26(2) of the
Equality Act 2010 succeeds. The respondent will pay the claimant an award for
injury to feelings of £16,000.00.
4. The claimant’s claim of unauthorised deduction of wages fails because she was
employed by a limited company that is dissolved, not E. The judgment given in
court was in error and has been reconsidered by me of my own motion.
5. The only judgment that can be made in favour of the claimant against the
respondent is the award for injury to feelings.
Case Number: 2501327/2018
2
EMPLOYMENT JUDGE SHORE
JUDGMENT SIGNED BY EMPLOYMENT
JUDGE ON
8 January 2020
Public access to employment tribunal decisions
Judgments and reasons for the judgments are published, in full, online at www.gov.uk/employmenttribunal-
decisions shortly after a copy has been sent to the claimant(s) and respondent(s) in a case.