M O Ogunbayo v Llewelyn Support Services Ltd: 6047376/2025
Employment Tribunal
Published on 12 October 2026, 14:50
- Summary
- Employment Tribunal decision.
- categories
-
breach-of-contract redundancy unfair-dismissal unlawful-deduction-from-wages
- country
- england-and-wales
- decision date
- 2026-09-18
Change History
-
Judgment
-
First published.
Full Decision Text
Raw text extracted from the official documents.
each
Case Number: 6047376/2025
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Claimant: MICHAEL OLAJIDE OGUNBAYO
Respondent: LLEWELYN SUPPORT SERVICES LTD
JUDGMENT
The complaint that the claimant was unfairly dismissed and the claim for a redundancy payment are struck out.
REASONS
1. The Claimant complains of unfair dismissal and claims the right to a redundancy payment.
2. Section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 requires a Claimant to have not less than two years service to make an unfair dismissal complaint.
3. Section 155 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 says that employees do not have the right to a redundancy payment unless they have been employed for two years or more.
4. The Claimant was employed by the Respondent for less than two years.
5. Therefore the Claimant is not entitled to bring a complaint of unfair dismissal or to claim a redundancy payment.
6. The Claimant has failed to give an acceptable reason, despite being given the opportunity to do so, why the complaints should not be struck out.
7. Accordingly, the complaint of unfair dismissal and the claim for a redundancy payment are struck out.
The Claimant’s other complaints are not affected by this judgment.
Approved by
Employment Judge Povey
Date: 7 May 2026
JUDGMENT SENT TO THE PARTIES ON
11 May 2026
Katie Dickson
FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE
Case No: 6047376/2025
1
OFFICIAL - SENSITIVE
OFFICIAL - SENSITIVE
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Claimant:
Mr Michael Olajide Ogunbayo
Respondent:
Llewellyn Support Services Limited
Heard at:
Cardiff Employment Tribunal (Via CVP)
On: 18 September 2026
Before:
Employment Judge Grubb
REPRESENTATION:
Claimant: In Person Respondent: Mr Pollitt (Counsel)
Judgment
1.
The Claimant’s claim for unlawful deduction of wages is not well-founded. That means that the Respondent did not make unlawful deductions from the Claimant’s wages.
2.
The Claimant’s claim for breach of contract is not well-founded. That means that the Respondent did not breach a contractual obligation to the Claimant.
Case No: 6047376/2025
2
OFFICIAL - SENSITIVE
OFFICIAL - SENSITIVE
Employment Judge Grubb
Date: 18 September 2026
SENT TO THE PARTIES ON
1 October 2026
FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE
Notes
Full reasons were given orally at the hearing. Written full reasons will not be provided unless requested by any party at the hearing, or by a written request received by the Tribunal within 14 days of the sending of the written record of the decision.
All judgments (apart from judgments under Rule 51) and any written full reasons for the judgments are published, in full, online at https://www.gov.uk/employment-tribunal-decisions shortly after a copy has been sent to the claimant(s) and respondent(s).
If a Tribunal hearing has been recorded, you may request a transcript of the recording. Unless there are exceptional circumstances, you will have to pay for it. If a transcript is produced it will not include any oral judgment or reasons given at the hearing. The transcript will not be checked, approved or verified by a judge. There is more information in the joint Presidential Practice Direction on the Recording and Transcription of Hearings and accompanying Guidance, which can be found here:
www.judiciary.uk/guidance-and-resources/employment-rules-and-legislation-practice-directions/
Related Parties
Search the database for other cases involving these individuals or companies.