Mr A Bongo v Tower Transit Operations Ltd: 2203712/2020
Employment Tribunal
Published on 20 November 2020, 09:33
- Summary
- Employment Tribunal decision.
- categories
-
age-discrimination health-safety race-discrimination unlawful-deduction-from-wages
- country
- england-and-wales
- decision date
- 2020-11-09
Official Documents
-
Mr A Bongo v Tower Transit Operations Ltd: 2203712/2020 - Preliminary
Change History
-
First published.
Full Decision Text
Raw text extracted from the official documents.
Case Number: 2203712/2020
1
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
BETWEEN
Claimant
MR A BONGO
Respondent
TOWER TRANSIT OPERATIONS LIMITED
OPEN PRELIMINARY HEARING JUDGMENT
HELD AT: London Central (CVP video audio call) ON: 3 November 2020
BEFORE: Employment Judge Russell (sitting alone)
REPRESENTATION:
Claimant: Mr Latinwo, Solicitor
Respondent: Mr Ludlow, Solicitor
Judgment
1. The correct name of the Respondent is Tower Transport Operations Limited.
2. The Claimant’s claims of Unauthorised deduction from Wages and race
discrimination are dismissed by withdrawal.
3. The Claimant’s claim of Victimisation is dismissed. There is no Protected Act under
S 27(2) Equality Act 2010 that could amount to or lead to a breach of section 27(1)
Equality Act 2010.
4. The Respondent’s application for a strike out and or strike out order under Rule 37
and or Rule 39 respectively be listed for a further one day Open Preliminary
Hearing ( Further OPH ) on 22 February 2020 a CVP hearing .
5. The Claimant’s application to amend the ET1 is accepted other than in respect of his
claimed Victimisation Claim subject to the Further OPH Hearing . In consequence
his claims of breach of contract and age discrimination ( direct and indirect ) shall
continue , subject to the Further OPH , to the listed full 3-day hearing 14,15,16 July
2021.
6. The Further OPH shall first determine the Claimant’s EDT and if the Tribunal has
jurisdiction to hear the Claimant’s remaining claims under section 111 of the ERA
1996 and or 207 Trade Union Labour Relations ( Consolidation ) Act 1992 ( as
amended ) and or 123 of the Equality Act 2010.
7. The Further OPH shall then, to the extent there is jurisdiction, consider which of the
Claimant’s outstanding claims ( if any ) have no reasonable or little prospect of
Case Number: 2203712/2020
2
success and determine if any shall be struck out or a deposit order made in respect
of such claims or claims.
EMPLOYMENT JUDGE
9 November 2020
Order sent to the parties on
10/11/2020
for Office of the Tribunals
Related Parties
Search the database for other cases involving these individuals or companies.