Mr A Pasieka v T Class Security Ltd: 3201467/2019
Employment Tribunal
Published on 30 August 2019, 08:47
- Summary
- Employment Tribunal decision.
- categories
-
unlawful-deduction-from-wages
- country
- england-and-wales
- decision date
- 2019-08-21
Official Documents
-
Mr A Pasieka v T Class Security Ltd: 3201467/2019 - Rule 21
Change History
-
First published.
Full Decision Text
Raw text extracted from the official documents.
Case No:3201467/2019
4.17 Rule 21 judgment – universal template. September 2017
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Claimant: Mr A Pasieka
Respondent: T.Class Security Limited
JUDGMENT
Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 21
Upon the Respondent failing to file an ET3 within the time limit imposed by rule 16 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
AND Upon considering the information provided by the Claimant in his ET1
1. The Claimant’s claim for arrears of pay brought either under Part II of the Employment Rights Act 1996 or the same claim brought under the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994 is well founded.
2. The Respondent is ordered to pay the Claimant the sum of £267.75 in wages calculated as 25.5 hours at £10.50 per hour.
3. The Claimant’s claim for travel expenses claim brought under the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994 is well founded.
4. The Respondent is further ordered to pay the Claimant £66.00 in travel expenses (4 x £14).
Case No:3201467/2019
4.17 Rule 21 judgment – universal template. September 2017
Employment Judge Crosfill
21 August 2019
Related Parties
Search the database for other cases involving these individuals or companies.