Back to Search

Mr B Varela v Datatel Solutions Ltd: 2401638/2017

Employment Tribunal

Published on 26 January 2018, 09:07

Summary
Employment Tribunal decision.
categories
age-discrimination breach-of-contract unfair-dismissal
country
england-and-wales
decision date
2017-07-12

Official Documents

  • Mr B Varela v Datatel Solutions Ltd: 2401638/2017 - Full
  • Mr B Varela v Datatel Solutions Ltd: 2401638/2017 - Reconsideration

Change History

  • Addition of reconsideration judgment.

  • First published.

Full Decision Text

Raw text extracted from the official documents.

Case No: 2401638/17 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr B Varela Respondent: Datatel Solutions Limited JUDGMENT Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 21 1. The tribunal has no jurisdiction to hear the claim of unfair dismissal, which claim is hereby dismissed. 2. The respondent breached the terms of the contract of employment and the respondent is ordered to pay damages to the claimant in the sum of £206.09. 3. The claim of direct discrimination under s13 Equality Act is well-founded. 4. The respondent is ordered to pay the sum of £7,135.20 to the claimant as compensation for the discriminatory acts. Employment Judge Porter Date: 12 July 2017 JUDGMENT SENT TO THE PARTIES ON 18 July 2017 AND ENTERED IN THE REGISTER FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE Case No: 2401638/17 NOTICE THE EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (INTEREST) ORDER 1990 Tribunal case number(s): 2401638/2017 Name of case(s): Mr B Varela v Datatel Solutions Limited The Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 provides that sums of money payable as a result of a judgment of an Employment Tribunal (excluding sums representing costs or expenses), shall carry interest where the full amount is not paid within 14 days after the day that the document containing the tribunal’s written judgment is recorded as having been sent to parties. That day is known as “the relevant decision day”. The date from which interest starts to accrue is called “the calculation day” and is the day immediately following the relevant decision day. The rate of interest payable is that specified in section 17 of the Judgments Act 1838 on the relevant decision day. This is known as "the stipulated rate of interest" and the rate applicable in your case is set out below. The following information in respect of this case is provided by the Secretary of the Tribunals in accordance with the requirements of Article 12 of the Order:- "the relevant decision day" is: 18 July 2017 "the calculation day" is: 19 July 2017 "the stipulated rate of interest" is: 8% MISS K MCDONAGH For the Employment Tribunal Office Case No: 2401638/17 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr B Varela Respondent: Datatel Solutions Limited Heard at: Manchester On: 29 November 2017 Before: Employment Judge Porter Representation Claimant: Mr R Varela, the claimant’s father Respondent: Mrs Johnrose, solicitor JUDGMENT ON RECONSIDERATION The judgment of the Tribunal is that: 1. The application for an extension of time to enter a Response is refused. 2. The Rule 21 judgment sent to the parties on 18 July 2017 is confirmed. Employment Judge Porter Date: 29 November 2017 JUDGMENT SENT TO THE PARTIES ON 6 December 2017 FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE Note Reasons for the judgment having been given orally at the hearing, written reasons will not be provided unless a request was made by either party at the hearing or a written request is presented by either party within 14 days of the sending of this written record of the decision.

Related Parties

Search the database for other cases involving these individuals or companies.