Mr B Varela v Datatel Solutions Ltd: 2401638/2017
Employment Tribunal
Published on 26 January 2018, 09:07
- Summary
- Employment Tribunal decision.
- categories
-
age-discrimination breach-of-contract unfair-dismissal
- country
- england-and-wales
- decision date
- 2017-07-12
Change History
-
Addition of reconsideration judgment.
-
First published.
Full Decision Text
Raw text extracted from the official documents.
Case No: 2401638/17
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Claimant: Mr B Varela
Respondent: Datatel Solutions Limited
JUDGMENT
Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 21
1. The tribunal has no jurisdiction to hear the claim of unfair dismissal, which claim is
hereby dismissed.
2. The respondent breached the terms of the contract of employment and the respondent
is ordered to pay damages to the claimant in the sum of £206.09.
3. The claim of direct discrimination under s13 Equality Act is well-founded.
4. The respondent is ordered to pay the sum of £7,135.20 to the claimant as
compensation for the discriminatory acts.
Employment Judge Porter
Date: 12 July 2017
JUDGMENT SENT TO THE PARTIES ON
18 July 2017
AND ENTERED IN THE REGISTER
FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE
Case No: 2401638/17
NOTICE
THE EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (INTEREST) ORDER 1990
Tribunal case number(s): 2401638/2017
Name of
case(s):
Mr B Varela v Datatel Solutions Limited
The Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 provides that sums of money payable as a
result of a judgment of an Employment Tribunal (excluding sums representing costs or
expenses), shall carry interest where the full amount is not paid within 14 days after the day
that the document containing the tribunal’s written judgment is recorded as having been sent
to parties. That day is known as “the relevant decision day”. The date from which interest
starts to accrue is called “the calculation day” and is the day immediately following the
relevant decision day.
The rate of interest payable is that specified in section 17 of the Judgments Act 1838 on the
relevant decision day. This is known as "the stipulated rate of interest" and the rate
applicable in your case is set out below.
The following information in respect of this case is provided by the Secretary of the Tribunals
in accordance with the requirements of Article 12 of the Order:-
"the relevant decision day" is: 18 July 2017
"the calculation day" is: 19 July 2017
"the stipulated rate of interest" is: 8%
MISS K MCDONAGH
For the Employment Tribunal Office
Case No: 2401638/17
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Claimant: Mr B Varela
Respondent: Datatel Solutions Limited
Heard at: Manchester On: 29 November 2017
Before: Employment Judge Porter
Representation
Claimant: Mr R Varela, the claimant’s father
Respondent: Mrs Johnrose, solicitor
JUDGMENT ON
RECONSIDERATION
The judgment of the Tribunal is that:
1. The application for an extension of time to enter a Response is
refused.
2. The Rule 21 judgment sent to the parties on 18 July 2017 is confirmed.
Employment Judge Porter
Date: 29 November 2017
JUDGMENT SENT TO THE PARTIES ON
6 December 2017
FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE
Note
Reasons for the judgment having been given orally at the hearing, written reasons will not be
provided unless a request was made by either party at the hearing or a written request is
presented by either party within 14 days of the sending of this written record of the decision.
Related Parties
Search the database for other cases involving these individuals or companies.