Mr C Boadu v Resourcing Group: 3202986/2019
Employment Tribunal
Published on 31 August 2021, 10:41
- Summary
- Employment Tribunal decision.
- categories
-
race-discrimination religion-or-belief-discrimination unfair-dismissal unlawful-deduction-from-wages written-pay-statement
- country
- england-and-wales
- decision date
- 2021-08-10
Official Documents
-
Mr C Boadu v Resourcing Group: 3202986/2019 - Strike Out
Change History
-
First published.
Full Decision Text
Raw text extracted from the official documents.
Case No:3202986/2019
6.5 Strike Out Judgment – response- part – rule 37
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Claimant: Mr C Boadu
Respondent: Resourcing Group
JUDGMENT
The claims brought by the Claimant are struck out
REASONS
1. The Claimant had brought claims of unfair dismissal, race discrimination,
discrimination based on religion or belief and claims for arrears of pay. By
a letter dated 17 December 2019 the Claimant was warned that the
tribunal were considering striking out his unfair dismissal claim as he did
not have 2 years continuous service. The Claimant was given until 25
December 2019 to say why the unfair dismissal claim should not be struck
out or to request a hearing. The Claimant did not respond to that letter.
2. The Respondent did not present an Et1. REJ Taylor directed that the
matter be a telephone hearing on 7 June 2021 to consider remedy (and by
inference the question of whether to issue a judgment under rule 21 of
Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of
Procedure) Regulations 2013). Neither the Claimant or Respondent
attended that hearing. None of the orders previously made had been
complied with.
3. By my case management summary written on 7 June 2021 and sent to the
parties on 8 June 2021 I warned the Claimant that I was considering
striking out the claim for any remedy on the basis that it was not being
actively pursued. I ordered the Claimant write to the Tribunal by no later
than 21 June 2021 to explain why he had not complied with any case
management orders and why he had failed to attend the remedy hearing.
The Claimant did not comply with that order nor has he requested a
hearing.
4. In the circumstances I am satisfied that the Claim is not being actively
pursued and I strike out all of the claims under rule 37 of Schedule 1 of the
Case No:3202986/2019
6.5 Strike Out Judgment – response- part – rule 37
Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations
2013. I strike out the unfair dismissal claim as the Claimant does not have
sufficient continuity of service to be able to bring such a claim and the
unfair dismissal claim has no reasonable prospects of success for that
reason.
Employment Judge Crosfill
10 August 2021
Related Parties
Search the database for other cases involving these individuals or companies.