Mr D Bryan v Roc Technologies Ltd: 1404204/2022
Employment Tribunal
Published on 10 November 2023, 10:27
- Summary
- Employment Tribunal decision.
- categories
-
breach-of-contract disability-discrimination unfair-dismissal unlawful-deduction-from-wages working-time-regulations
- country
- england-and-wales
- decision date
- 2023-10-04
Change History
-
Dismissal added
-
First published.
Full Decision Text
Raw text extracted from the official documents.
Case Number: 1404204/2022
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Claimant: Mr D Bryan
Respondent: Roc Technologies LTD
JUDGMENT
The complaint that the claimant was unfairly dismissed is struck out.
REASONS
1. The claimant complains of unfair dismissal.
2. Section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 requires a claimant to have not less than
two years’ service to make an unfair dismissal complaint.
3. The claimant was employed by the respondent for less than two years.
4. Therefore, the claimant is not entitled to bring such a complaint.
5. The claimant has failed to give an acceptable reason, despite being given the opportunity
to do so, why the complaint should not be struck out.
6. Accordingly, the complaint of unfair dismissal is struck out. The claimant’s other
complaints are not affected by this judgment.
_____________________________
Employment Judge Smail
Date: 9 May 2023
Judgment sent to the Parties on 18 May 2023
For the Tribunal Office
Case No: 1404204/2022
10.2 Judgment - rule 61
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Claimant: Mr D Bryan
Respondent: ROC Technologies Limited
Heard at: Remotely by Cloud Video Platform (CVP)
On: 4th October 2023
Before: Employment Judge Lambert
Representation
Claimant: No attendance
Respondent: Miss G Lane, Employee Relations Manager
JUDGMENT
1. The Claimant’s claims are dismissed due to his lack of attendance, in
accordance with Rule 47 of the ET Rules 2013 and further and/or additionally
in accordance with Rule 37(1)(d) for failing to actively pursue the claim as
evidence by his failure to comply with Case Management Orders.
2. The Claimant failed to attend an earlier Preliminary Hearing before EJ King
on 12th July 2023. EJ King issued a Case Management Order on 14th July
2023 re-listing this matter for today. The Claimant was ordered to file a Case
Management Agenda in advance of this hearing.
3. The Claimant failed to attend. He did not file a Case Management Agenda.
The Clerk emailed the Claimant to ascertain his intention, but he did not
respond. There was no telephone number provided on the Claim Form.
4. In the light of the Claimant’s failure to attend 2 Preliminary Hearings and to
provide any reasons why he did not, his claims were dismissed.
Case No: 1404204/2022
10.2 Judgment - rule 61
Employment Judge Lambert
Date: 4th October 2023
Judgment sent to the Parties on 24 October 2023
For the Tribunal Office
Related Parties
Search the database for other cases involving these individuals or companies.