Mr D D Kumarage v Centrica plc: 3306285/2024
Employment Tribunal
Published on 28 October 2026, 16:10
- Summary
- Employment Tribunal decision.
- categories
-
public-interest-disclosure religion-or-belief-discrimination unfair-dismissal
- country
- england-and-wales
- decision date
- 2026-09-18
Official Documents
-
Mr D D Kumarage v Centrica plc: 3306285/2024 - Dismissal
Change History
-
First published.
Full Decision Text
Raw text extracted from the official documents.
OFFICIAL
OFFICIAL
Case Number: 3306285.2024
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Claimant: Mr Dinesh D Kumarage
Respondent: Centrica PLC
Heard at: Reading (by video) On: 14-18 September 2026
Before: Employment Judge Findlay and
Members: Mrs HT Edwards and Ms M Harris
Representation
Claimant: In person assisted by his wife (and MacKenzie friend) Ms K
Shah
Respondent: Mr J Boyd, Counsel
JUDGMENT
The claimant’s claims of:
1. Automatic unfair dismissal under section 103A of the Employment Rights
Act 1996;
2. Detriment on the grounds of protected public interest disclosure under
sections 47B and 48 of the Employment Rights Act 1996; and of
3. Direct discrimination because of philosophical belief under sections 10 and
13 of the Equality Act 2010
Are not well founded and are dismissed.
Approved by:
Employment Judge Findlay
18 September 2026
JUDGMENT SENT TO THE PARTIES ON
14 October 2026
FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE
OFFICIAL
OFFICIAL
Notes
Summary reasons were given orally at the hearing. Written summary reasons will not be provided
unless requested by any party at the hearing, or by a written request received by the Tribunal
within 14 days of the sending of the written record of the decision.
All judgments (apart from judgments under Rule 51) and any written full reasons for judgments
are published, in full, online at https://www.gov.uk/employment-tribunal-decisions shortly after a
copy has been sent to the claimant(s) and respondent(s).
If a Tribunal hearing has been recorded, you may request a transcript of the recording. Unless there are
exceptional circumstances, you will have to pay for it. If a transcript is produced it will not include any oral
judgment or reasons given at the hearing. The transcript will not be checked, approved or verified by a judge.
There is more information in the joint Presidential Practice Direction on the Recording and Transcription of
Hearings and accompanying Guidance, which can be found here:
www.judiciary.uk/guidance-and-resources/employment-rules-and-legislation-practice-directions/
Related Parties
Search the database for other cases involving these individuals or companies.