Back to Search

Mr E Anthonio v Tesco Stores Ltd: 3318907/2019

Employment Tribunal

Published on 01 June 2022, 07:51

Summary
Employment Tribunal decision.
categories
race-discrimination religion-or-belief-discrimination
country
england-and-wales
decision date
2022-02-03

Official Documents

  • Mr E Anthony v Tesco Stores Ltd: 3318907/2019 - Judgment
  • Mr E Anthonio v Tesco Stores Ltd: 3318907/2019 - Certificate of Correction
  • Mr E Anthonio v Tesco Stores Ltd: 3318907/2019 - Amended Judgment

Change History

  • Claimants surname changed and Certificate of Correction and Amended Judgment attached.

  • First published.

Full Decision Text

Raw text extracted from the official documents.

Case Number: 3318907/2019 (V) ph outcome re case management 1 July 2014 version EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant Respondent Mr Edison Anthony V Tesco Stores Ltd Heard at: Watford On: 1-3 February 2022 Before: Employment Judge Bedeau Members: Mr S Bury Mr P English Appearances: For the Claimant: In person For the Respondents: Ms R Kight, Counsel JUDGMENT 1. The claim of victimisation is not well-founded and is dismissed. 2. The claim of direct race discrimination is dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. 3. The claimant is ordered to pay the respondent’s costs in the sum of £1,750. Employment Judge Bedeau 3 February 2022 JUDGMENT SENT TO THE PARTIES ON 01 March 2022 FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE Note: Reasons for the judgment having been given orally at the hearing, written reasons will not be provided unless a request was made by either party at the hearing, or a written request is presented by either party within 14 days of the sending of this written record of the decision. Parties must be aware that if written reasons are requested a detailed judgment will be issued which will be on the Tribunals’ website to which members of the public have access. Case number: 3318907/2019 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr E Anthonio Respondent: Tesco Stores Limited CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 Under the provisions of Rule 69, the Judgment sent to the parties on 1 March 2022, is corrected by amending the claimant’s name as set out in block type below: Claimant: Mr Edison Anthonio _____________________________ Employment Judge Bedeau _____________________________ Date: 25 May 2022 SENT TO THE PARTIES ON 27 May 2022 FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE Important note to parties: Any dates for the filing of appeals or reviews are not changed by this certificate of correction and corrected judgment. These time limits still run from the date of the original judgment, or original judgment with reasons, when appealing. Case Number: 3318907/2019 (V) ph outcome re case management 1 July 2014 version EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant Respondent Mr Edison Anthonio V Tesco Stores Ltd Heard at: Watford On: 1-3 February 2022 Before: Employment Judge Bedeau Members: Mr S Bury Mr P English Appearances: For the Claimant: In person For the Respondents: Ms R Kight, Counsel JUDGMENT 1. The claim of victimisation is not well-founded and is dismissed. 2. The claim of direct race discrimination is dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. 3. The claimant is ordered to pay the respondent’s costs in the sum of £1,750. Employment Judge Bedeau 3 February 2022 JUDGMENT SENT TO THE PARTIES ON 01 March 2022 FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE Note: Reasons for the judgment having been given orally at the hearing, written reasons will not be provided unless a request was made by either party at the hearing, or a written request is presented by either party within 14 days of the sending of this written record of the decision. Parties must be aware that if written reasons are requested a detailed judgment will be issued which will be on the Tribunals’ website to which members of the public have access.

Related Parties

Search the database for other cases involving these individuals or companies.