Mr E Fox v Endorphins Group: 2600265/2024
Employment Tribunal
Published on 22 April 2024, 09:14
- Summary
- Employment Tribunal decision.
- categories
-
breach-of-contract redundancy unlawful-deduction-from-wages working-time-regulations written-pay-statement
- country
- england-and-wales
- decision date
- 2024-04-02
Official Documents
-
Mr E Fox v Endorphins Group: 2600265/2024 - Partial Strike Out
Change History
-
First published.
Full Decision Text
Raw text extracted from the official documents.
Case Number: 2600265/2024
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Claimant: Mr E Fox
Respondent: Endorphins Group
JUDGMENT
The claim for a redundancy payment is struck out.
REASONS
1. The claimant claims the right to a redundancy payment.
2. Section 155 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 says that employees do not have the right to a redundancy payment unless they have been employed for two years or more.
3. The claimant was employed by the respondent for less than two years.
4. Therefore, the claimant does not have the right to a redundancy payment.
5. The claimant was given the opportunity to explain why the claim for a redundancy payment should not be struck out but has not given an acceptable reason.
6. Accordingly, the claim for a redundancy payment is struck out. The claimant’s other complaints are not affected by this judgment.
________________________
Employment Judge McTigue
Date: 2 April 2024
Related Parties
Search the database for other cases involving these individuals or companies.