Employment Tribunals

Case Number: 3323388/2019 Page 1 of 1 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS BETWEEN Claimant Respondent Mr E Joslin and Procan Bioscience Limited (No response entered) JUDGMENT Rule 21 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 1. The Respondent failed to present a response to the claim and judgment is entered in favour of the Claimant as follows. 2. The Respondent has made unlawful deductions from the Claimant’s wages, breached his contract of employment and failed to pay all holiday pay due. 3. The Respondent is ordered to pay £863.83 to the Claimant. 4. The Claimant’s claim for a redundancy payment is dismissed on the basis that he does not have the necessary length of service to bring such a claim. 5. The Claimant’s claim in relation to the provision of payslip(s) will continue to a hearing. Public Access to Employment Tribunal Judgments 6. The parties are informed that all judgments and reasons for judgments are published, in full, online at www.gov.uk/employment-tribunal-decisions shortly after a copy has been sent to the Claimant and Respondent. ______________________ Employment Judge Anstis Date: 11 December 2019 Sent to the parties on …………………………………….. …………….……………...…….. for the Tribunal Office Case Number: 3323388/2019 Page 1 of 2 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Respondent: Mr E Joslin v Procan Bioscience Limited (no response entered) Heard at: Reading (by CVP) On: 3 December 2020 Before: Employment Judge Anstis Appearances: For the Claimant: In person For the Respondent: No attendance or representation JUDGMENT 1. The respondent has failed to give the claimant any pay statement in accordance with section 8 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. 2. No award is made under s12(3) or 24(2) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. _____________________________ Employment Judge Anstis 3 December 2020 Sent to the parties on: 14 December 20 For the Tribunal Office Note: Reasons for the judgment having been given orally at the hearing, written reasons will not be provided unless a request was made by either party at the hearing or a written request is presented by either party within 14 days of the sending of this written record of the decision. This has been a remote hearing. The form of remote hearing was video - CVP. A face to face hearing was not held because all issues could be determined in a remote hearing. The documents that the tribunal was referred to were the tribunal file only. The judgment made is set out above. Public access to employment tribunal decisions: Case Number: 3323388/2019 Page 2 of 2 All judgments and reasons for the judgments are published, in full, online at www.gov.uk/employment-tribunal-decisions shortly after a copy has been sent to the claimant(s) and respondent(s) in a case.