Back to Search

Mr E Prager v Captec Ltd: 1400690/2019

Employment Tribunal

Published on 28 October 2019, 10:40

Summary
Employment Tribunal decision.
categories
unlawful-deduction-from-wages
country
england-and-wales
decision date
2019-10-10

Official Documents

  • Mr E Prager v Captec Ltd: 1400690/2019 - Dismissal

Change History

  • First published.

Full Decision Text

Raw text extracted from the official documents.

Case Number: 1400690/2019 1 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant v Respondent Mr E Prager Captec Limited Heard at: Southampton Employment Tribunal On: 10 October 2019 Before: Employment Judge Rayner Appearances For the Claimant: Mr E Prager in person For the Respondent: Mr Toti (Owner of respondent company) JUDGMENT The Claimants claim for bonus pay £22, 230.00 is dismissed. Employment Judge Rayner Date 10 October 2019 Judgment sent to parties on: 23 October 2019 For the Tribunal Office Notes Reasons for the judgment having been given orally at the hearing, written reasons will not be provided unless a request was made by either party at the hearing or a written request is presented by either party within 14 days of the sending of this written record of the decision. Case Number: 1400690/2019 2 Public access to employment tribunal decisions Judgments and reasons for the judgments are published, in full, online at www.gov.uk/employment-tribunal-decisions shortly after a copy has been sent to the claimant(s) and respondent(s) in a case. Note: online publication of judgments and reasons The ET is required to maintain a register of all judgments and written reasons. The register must be accessible to the public. It has recently been moved online. All judgments and reasons since February 2017 are now available at: https://www.gov.uk/employment-tribunal-decisions. The ET has no power to refuse to place a judgment or reasons on the online register, or to remove a judgment or reasons from the register once they have been placed there. If you consider that these documents should be anonymised in any way prior to publication, you will need to apply to the ET for an order to that effect under Rule 50 of the ET's Rules of Procedure. Such an application would need to be copied to all other parties for comment and it would be carefully scrutinised by a judge (where appropriate, with panel members) before deciding whether (and to what extent) anonymity should be granted to a party or a witness

Related Parties

Search the database for other cases involving these individuals or companies.