Mr E Prager v Captec Ltd: 1400690/2019
Employment Tribunal
Published on 28 October 2019, 10:40
- Summary
- Employment Tribunal decision.
- categories
-
unlawful-deduction-from-wages
- country
- england-and-wales
- decision date
- 2019-10-10
Official Documents
-
Mr E Prager v Captec Ltd: 1400690/2019 - Dismissal
Change History
-
First published.
Full Decision Text
Raw text extracted from the official documents.
Case Number: 1400690/2019
1
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Claimant v Respondent
Mr E Prager Captec Limited
Heard at: Southampton Employment Tribunal
On: 10 October 2019
Before: Employment Judge Rayner
Appearances
For the Claimant: Mr E Prager in person
For the Respondent: Mr Toti (Owner of respondent company)
JUDGMENT
The Claimants claim for bonus pay £22, 230.00 is dismissed.
Employment Judge Rayner
Date 10 October 2019
Judgment sent to parties on: 23 October 2019
For the Tribunal Office
Notes
Reasons for the judgment having been given orally at the hearing, written reasons will not be
provided unless a request was made by either party at the hearing or a written request is
presented by either party within 14 days of the sending of this written record of the decision.
Case Number: 1400690/2019
2
Public access to employment tribunal decisions
Judgments and reasons for the judgments are published, in full, online at
www.gov.uk/employment-tribunal-decisions shortly after a copy has been sent to the
claimant(s) and respondent(s) in a case.
Note: online publication of judgments and reasons
The ET is required to maintain a register of all judgments and written reasons. The
register must be accessible to the public. It has recently been moved online. All
judgments and reasons since February 2017 are now available at:
https://www.gov.uk/employment-tribunal-decisions.
The ET has no power to refuse to place a judgment or reasons on the online
register, or to remove a judgment or reasons from the register once they have been
placed there. If you consider that these documents should be anonymised in any
way prior to publication, you will need to apply to the ET for an order to that effect
under Rule 50 of the ET's Rules of Procedure. Such an application would need to
be copied to all other parties for comment and it would be carefully scrutinised by a
judge (where appropriate, with panel members) before deciding whether (and to
what extent) anonymity should be granted to a party or a witness
Related Parties
Search the database for other cases involving these individuals or companies.