Back to Search

Mr K Hook v ISS Facilities Services Ltd: 3201967/2016

Employment Tribunal

Published on 31 July 2017, 15:10

Summary
Employment Tribunal decision.
categories
disability-discrimination unfair-dismissal
country
england-and-wales
decision date
2017-07-04

Official Documents

  • Mr K Hook v ISS Facilities Services Ltd: 3201967/2016 Final
  • Mr K Hook v ISS Facilities Services Ltd: 3201967/2016 - Full

Change History

  • Addition of further judgment.

  • First published.

Full Decision Text

Raw text extracted from the official documents.

Case No. 3201967/2016 1 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr K Hook Respondent: ISS Facilities Services Limited HELD AT: Liverpool ON: 27 April 2017 BEFORE: Employment Judge T V Ryan REPRESENTATION: Claimant: Respondent: Litigant in person Ms N Siddall-Collier, Employment Law Specialist JUDGMENT The judgment of the Tribunal is that: 1. The claimant's claim that the respondent failed in its statutory duty to make reasonable adjustments was presented to the Tribunal out of time in circumstances when it would not be just and equitable to extend time to the date of eventual presentation. The claimant's disability discrimination claims are dismissed. 2. The claimant is in breach of a Case Management Order made on 11 January 2017 and sent to him on 17 January 2017, being an order to provide his medical records and a personal statement addressing the section 6 Equality Act 2010 definition of disability to the respondent; he has made partial disclosure only. Any consideration of a costs order consequent upon the claimant's breach is deferred to the conclusion of the claim of unfair dismissal which is to be listed for a final hearing. Employment Judge T V Ryan Date: 3rd May 2017 JUDGMENT SENT TO THE PARTIES ON 9 May 2017 FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE Case No : 3201967/2016 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr K Hook Respondent: ISS Facility Services Limited JUDGMENT The claim is struck out. REASONS 1. By a letter dated 20/06/2017 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or to request a hearing, as to why the claim should not be struck out because  the claimant had not complied with the Case Management Order of the Tribunal dated 03/05/2017.  it has not been actively pursued. 2. The claimant has failed to make representations in writing, or has failed to make any sufficient representations, why this should not be done or to request a hearing. The claim is therefore struck out. 3. The hearing fixed for 17-18/07/2017 will not take place. Employment Judge K Robinson 04-07-17 JUDGMENT SENT TO THE PARTIES ON 6 July 2017 FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE

Related Parties

Search the database for other cases involving these individuals or companies.