Mr M H Waheed v Ruby Security Ltd: 1806727/2022
Employment Tribunal
Published on 27 November 2023, 10:13
- Summary
- Employment Tribunal decision.
- categories
-
unfair-dismissal unlawful-deduction-from-wages working-time-regulations
- country
- england-and-wales
- decision date
- 2023-11-09
Official Documents
-
Mr M H Waheed v Ruby Security Ltd: 1806727/2022 - Judgment
Change History
-
First published.
Full Decision Text
Raw text extracted from the official documents.
Case: 1806727/2022
1
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Claimant: Mr MH Waheed
Respondent: Ruby Security Limited.
AT A HEARING
Heard at: Leeds On: 9th November 2023
Before: Employment Judge Lancaster
Representation
Claimant: Did not attend
Respondent: Mr J West, director
The Claimant having been clearly notified at 12.20 on 8th November 2023 that the hearing
would go ahead did make any contact with the Tribunal, and did not attend. Under rule 47 of
the Employment Tribunal Rule of Procedure 2013 the hearing proceeded in his absence.
JUDGMENT
1. The Respondent has admittedly made an unauthorised deduction from the Claimant’s
wages and is ordered to pay him, for 43 ½ hours worked between 24th July and 14th
August 2022 @ £9.50 per hour, the gross sum of £413.25 without any purported but
unnotified deduction for mileage.
2. The Respondent has admittedly failed to pay the Claimant for accrued holiday pay up
to the pleaded date of termination of employment, 14th August 2022, and is ordered to
pay him the sum calculated by them of £52.44 gross.
3. The Respondent did not fail to give the Claimant a written statement of the terms and
conditions of employment, so there is no uplift to those awards under section 38 of the
Employment Act 2002.
4. The burden of proof being on him and the Claimant having provided no evidence either
that he was dismissed, whether on the pleaded termination date or at all, or that the
reason or principal reason for any dismissal was that he had alleged that there had
been an infringement of a statutory right, the claim of automatically unfair dismissal
under section 104 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 is dismissed.
Case: 1806727/2022
2
EMPLOYMENT JU DGE LANCASTER
DATE 9th November 2023
Related Parties
Search the database for other cases involving these individuals or companies.