Mr Matthew Wright v GEC Solutions Ltd: 2500003/2018
Employment Tribunal
Published on 01 March 2019, 10:13
- Summary
- Employment Tribunal decision.
- categories
-
breach-of-contract unlawful-deduction-from-wages working-time-regulations
- country
- england-and-wales
- decision date
- 2018-02-12
Official Documents
-
Mr Matthew Wright v GEC Solutions Ltd: 2500003/2018 - Rule 21
-
Mr Matthew Wright v GEC Solutions Ltd: 2500003/2018 - Reasons Judgment
Decision Content
Read the decision in full .
Read the decision in full .
Change History
-
Reasons Judgment
-
First published.
Full Decision Text
Raw text extracted from the official documents.
Case Numbers: 2500003/2018
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Claimant: Mr Matthew Wright
Respondent: GEC Solutions Limited
JUDGMENT
Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 21
1. The following claims advanced by the claimant are well-founded:
1.1 The claim for a declaration in respect of unauthorised deductions from
wages.
1.2 The claim in respect of unpaid holiday pay.
1.3 The claim for breach of contract in respect of damages for wrongful
dismissal and unpaid expenses.
REASONS
1. The claimant filed a claim with the Tribunal on 2 January 2018 which
was served on the Respondent on 3 January 2018 and a response was to
be filed by 31 January 2018.
2. The respondent has failed to file a response to the claim. The claimant
is therefore entitled to Judgment under Rule 21.
3. The claimant is to file a fully detailed schedule of loss by 4pm on 7
February 2018 at which time consideration will be given to the issuing of a
further Rule 21 Judgment dealing with remedy. The claimant should note
that any claim for unpaid notice pay will be awarded on the basis of net
pay and the schedule of loss should be calculated accordingly in relation
to that claim.
4. The hearing ion 1 March 2018 will remain in the list for the moment.
5. The application from the claimant to transfer this case to be heard in
London is postponed for consideration until after it has been decided if a
further Rule 21 Judgment can be issued and the case fully disposed of.
Employment Judge A M Buchanan
Date: 1 February 2018
Case Numbers: 2500003/2018
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Claimant: Mr Matthew Wright
Respondent: GEC Solutions Limited
JUDGMENT
Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 21
1. The respondent is ordered to pay to the claimant the sum of
£2703.00p unpaid wages. This is a gross amount and the claimant shall
account to the appropriate authorities for any income tax and employee
national insurance contributions due in respect of such sum on receipt by
him. This represents unpaid wages for the period 15 October 2017 until 31
October 2017 of £1200 and unpaid commission of £1503.00p.
2. The respondent is ordered to pay to the claimant the sum of £506.30p
unpaid wages. This is a gross amount and the claimant shall account to
the appropriate authorities for any income tax and employee national
insurance contributions due in respect of such sum on receipt by him.
3. The respondent is ordered to pay to the claimant £1240.16 damages
for breach of contract. This represents £415 damages for unpaid notice
pay and £825.16 in respect of unpaid expenses.
4. The total sum of £4449.46 due from the respondent to the claimant is
payable forthwith.
REASONS
1. Judgment on Liability was granted on 1 February 2018.
2. The claimant has filed a detailed schedule of loss and supporting
papers which satisfy me that the above mentioned sums are due to him
from the respondent.
3. The hearing set for 1 March 2018 is cancelled.
4. On 7 February 2018 the respondent requested it be sent copies of the
claim form in this matter and these were sent by the Tribunal on 8
February 2018. This request was sent by David T Baird HR Director.
Case Numbers: 2500003/2018
5. On 8 February 2018 the respondent again requested the same papers.
This request was made by Kevin Lumley Compliance Director. The
respondent has not submitted any draft form of response or application for
an extension of time in which to file a response or for reconsideration of
the Judgment of 1 February 2018 in the correct form. In such
circumstances I am satisfied that a Rule 21 Judgment in respect of remedy
is appropriate.
Employment Judge A M Buchanan
Date: 12 February 2018
Related Parties
Search the database for other cases involving these individuals or companies.