Mr P Baker v R1 Electronics Ltd: 2500439/2019
Employment Tribunal
Published on 18 June 2019, 14:09
- Summary
- Employment Tribunal decision.
- categories
-
breach-of-contract redundancy
- country
- england-and-wales
- decision date
- 2019-05-24
Official Documents
-
Mr P Baker v R1 Electronics Ltd: 2500439/2019 - Judgment and Reasons
Change History
-
First published.
Full Decision Text
Raw text extracted from the official documents.
Case No: 2500439/2019
10.7 Judgment with reasons – rule 62 March 2017
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Claimant: Mr P Baker
Respondent: R1 Electronics Ltd
Heard at: Middlesbrough On: 13 May 2019
Before: Employment Judge O’Dempsey
Representation
Claimant: self
Respondent: no attendance or representation
JUDGMENT
The tribunal having considered the non-attendance of the Respondent
under rule 47 of the Tribunal Rules, and having decided to continue with the
hearing in the absence of the Respondent, the Claimant’s claims for
redundancy payment and notice pay succeed.
The claimant is entitled to a redundancy payment of £6688.50, and to
damages for breach of contract of £3527.04.
REASONS
1. This case was listed for a full hearing today 13 May 2019. The respondent
had returned form ET 3 on 11 April 2019. It explained that it had ceased
trading and said that there is no money for a redundancy payment.
2. The respondent received notice on 14 March 2019 giving today's date as
the hearing date. It did not indicate that it was proposing not to attend. In
those circumstances when the respondent failed to attend this morning I
caused enquiries to be made at the tribunal and also for the tribunal
administrative staff to attempt to make contact with the first respondent. The
first respondent had given a contact address in the Republic of Ireland. It
was therefore not possible for the administrative staff to telephone that
Case No: 2500439/2019
10.7 Judgment with reasons – rule 62 March 2017
number. Instead the tribunal staff sent an email requesting an immediate
response to the email given on the form ET 3. The clerk also made a search
in the building to see whether anyone had attended. In the circumstances
these were all the practicable steps that could be taken to see whether the
respondent was going to attend and to establish whether it had reasons for
non-attendance.
3. There were no responses to the attempts to find the respondent. In those
circumstances I decided under rule 47 of the Tribunal's rules of procedure
to proceed with the hearing. I heard evidence from the claimant.
4. He was employed in electronics assembly from 15 March 2004 until 21
December 2018. He is aged 62.
5. His evidence was that he earned £1274 monthly (gross) and £1130 net
monthly. He had received neither redundancy payment nor his notice pay.
I am satisfied based on his evidence that he was made redundant without
notice.
6. In his evidence he confirmed that box 8.2 of his form ET 1 was true to the
best of his knowledge and belief. He also told me that he had checked the
Companies House website last Friday and that the company was still listed
as an active company. There is no evidence therefore that the company has
gone into liquidation or other form of insolvency.
7. In those circumstances I considered that the claimant is entitled to a
redundancy payment. He is also entitled to 12 weeks notice, by way of
statutory minimum notice under the Employment Rights Act 1996.
8. I considered what the correct amount of weekly pay should be for the
calculation of his redundancy payment. It appeared to me that the claimant
had used his net pay figure to calculate the redundancy payment in his claim
form. Based on his gross monthly pay I calculated that his weekly gross pay
should be £318 .50.
9. The claimant is therefore entitled to a redundancy payment of £6688.50.
This is based on his age and the number of years of continuous employment
that he has.
10. He is also entitled to damages for breach of contract in that the respondent
failed to pay him any notice payment. This is calculated on the basis of his
net pay and I calculate that he is entitled to £3527.04 p.
_____________________________________
Employment Judge O’Dempsey
______________________________________
Date 24 May 2019
Case No: 2500439/2019
10.7 Judgment with reasons – rule 62 March 2017
NOTICE
THE EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (INTEREST) ORDER 1990
Tribunal case number(s): 2500439/2019
Name of case(s): Mr P Baker v R1 Electronics Ltd.
The Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 provides that sums of money payable as
a result of a judgment of an Employment Tribunal (excluding sums representing costs or
expenses), shall carry interest where the full amount is not paid within 14 days after the
day that the document containing the tribunal’s written judgment is recorded as having
been sent to parties. That day is known as “the relevant decision day”. The date from
which interest starts to accrue is called “the calculation day” and is the day immediately
following the relevant decision day.
The rate of interest payable is that specified in section 17 of the Judgments Act 1838 on
the relevant decision day. This is known as "the stipulated rate of interest" and the rate
applicable in your case is set out below.
The following information in respect of this case is provided by the Secretary of the
Tribunals in accordance with the requirements of Article 12 of the Order:-
"the relevant decision day" is: 29 May 2019
"the calculation day" is: 30 May 2019
"the stipulated rate of interest" is: 8%
MISS K FEATHERSTONE
For the Employment Tribunal Office
Case No: 2500439/2019
10.7 Judgment with reasons – rule 62 March 2017
INTEREST ON TRIBUNAL AWARDS
GUIDANCE NOTE
1. This guidance note should be read in conjunction with the booklet, ‘The Judgment’
which can be found on our website at
www.gov.uk/government/publications/employment-tribunal-hearings-judgmentguide-
t426
If you do not have access to the internet, paper copies can be obtained by telephoning the
tribunal office dealing with the claim.
2. The Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 provides for interest to be paid
on employment tribunal awards (excluding sums representing costs or expenses) if they
remain wholly or partly unpaid more than 14 days after the date on which the Tribunal’s
judgment is recorded as having been sent to the parties, which is known as “the relevant
decision day”.
3. The date from which interest starts to accrue is the day immediately following the
relevant decision day and is called “the calculation day”. The dates of both the relevant
decision day and the calculation day that apply in your case are recorded on the Notice
attached to the judgment. If you have received a judgment and subsequently request
reasons (see ‘The Judgment’ booklet) the date of the relevant judgment day will remain
unchanged.
4. “Interest” means simple interest accruing from day to day on such part of the sum
of money awarded by the tribunal for the time being remaining unpaid. Interest does not
accrue on deductions such as Tax and/or National Insurance Contributions that are to be
paid to the appropriate authorities. Neither does interest accrue on any sums which the
Secretary of State has claimed in a recoupment notice (see ‘The Judgment’ booklet).
5. Where the sum awarded is varied upon a review of the judgment by the
Employment Tribunal or upon appeal to the Employment Appeal Tribunal or a higher
appellate court, then interest will accrue in the same way (from "the calculation day"), but
on the award as varied by the higher court and not on the sum originally awarded by the
Tribunal.
6. ‘The Judgment’ booklet explains how employment tribunal awards are enforced.
The interest element of an award is enforced in the same way.
Related Parties
Search the database for other cases involving these individuals or companies.