Employment Tribunals

Case Number: 6023453/2024 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr S Parthasarathy Respondents: Jumar Solutions Limited (1) Jumar Technology Limited (2) Heard at: Bristol (by CVP video) On: 26 September 2025 Before: Employment Judge Leverton Representation Claimant: In person Respondent: Mr A Bramhall, solicitor JUDGMENT Jumar Technology Limited is added to the proceedings as a second respondent under rule 35 of the Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. The claimant did not have a contract of employment with either of the respondents at the relevant time. The complaint of breach of contract under the Employment Tribunals (Extension of Jurisdiction) England and Wales Order 1994 is therefore dismissed because the tribunal does not have jurisdiction to determine it. Approved by: Employment Judge Leverton 30 September 2025 Judgment sent to the parties on 22 October 2025 For the tribunal Notes Reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing. Written reasons will not be provided unless a party asked for them at the hearing or a party makes a written request within 14 days of the sending of this written record of the decision. If written reasons are provided they will be placed online. Judgments (apart from judgments under rule 51) and reasons for the judgments are published, in full, online at www.gov.uk/employment-tribunal-decisions shortly after a copy has been sent to the claimant(s) and respondent(s) in a case. If a tribunal hearing has been recorded, you may request a transcript of the recording. Unless there are exceptional circumstances, you will have to pay for it. If a transcript is produced it will not include any oral judgment or reasons given at the hearing. The transcript will not be checked, approved or verified by a judge. There is more information in the joint Presidential Practice Direction on the Recording and Transcription of Hearings and accompanying Guidance, which can be found here: www.judiciary.uk/guidance-and-resources/employment-rules-and-legislation-practice-directions/