Mr S Ratchford v Cablecomm Training Ltd: 2503407/2018
Employment Tribunal
Published on 04 April 2019, 15:16
- Summary
- Employment Tribunal decision.
- categories
-
breach-of-contract redundancy unlawful-deduction-from-wages working-time-regulations
- country
- england-and-wales
- decision date
- 2019-02-06
Official Documents
-
Mr S Ratchford v Cablecomm Training Ltd: 2503407/2018 - Judgment
Change History
-
First published.
Full Decision Text
Raw text extracted from the official documents.
Case Number 2503407/18
1
THE EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Claimant Respondent
Mr S Ratchford Cablecomm Training Ltd
JUDGMENT OF THE EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNAL
HELD AT MIDDLESBROUGH ON 6 February 2019
EMPLOYMENT JUDGE GARNON ( Sitting Alone )
Appearances
Claimant in person Respondent Mr B Merrells Consultant
JUDGMENT
1 The name of the respondent is amended to that shown above
2.The claimant is entitled to a redundancy payment of £10922
3 The claims of wrongful dismissal (breach of contract), unlawful deduction of wages
and compensation for untaken annual leave are withdrawn but will not be dismissed as
the claimant intends to bring proceedings in the Courts and I am satisfied under Rule 52
of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013 ( the Rules) there would be
legitimate reason for him to do so.
REASONS
1. The claimant was a director but it is conceded also an employee whose continuous
employment started on 14 March 2000 and ended when he was dismissed, without
notice, but with the promise of payment in lieu , by reason of redundancy on 9 May
2018. He was born on 22 December 1969.
2.The claim was presented on 13 November 2018 and ticks the boxes on the claim form
for a redundancy payment, notice pay, holiday pay, arrears of pay and “other
payments”. All but the first were presented outside the time limit for doing so .
3. The claimant’s gross weekly pay was £1302 and his net was £687.23. He was
entitled to a pension and a company car. The statutory cap on a week’s pay for
calculating a redundancy payment was £508. Redundancy is defined in s 139 of the
Employment Rights Act 1996 (the Act). If dismissal is for that reason the employee is
entitled to a redundancy payment calculated by a formula in s162. Reckoning back from
Case Number 2503407/18
2
the “ relevant date” which is the expiry of his statutory notice period ie 1 August 2018,
he has 18 years continuous employment. For each year during the whole of which he
was over 41 he receives 1.5 weeks pay and each year under 41, 1 weeks pay . He
reached 41 on 22 December 2010 so he has 7 years over 41 and 11 under 41. His
entitlement is 21.5 weeks pay = £10922 .
4. His notice pay assuming no mitigation would be 12x ££687.23= £8246.76 . He would
also be entitled to pension contributions and loss of use of the company car. He says
he has 15 days accrued but untaken annual leave , the respondent says he has none.
The response agrees he was dismissed by reason of redundancy, says it lacks funds
but intends to pay any outstanding sums when they are quantified and it is able to afford
to pay .It says deductions will be made related to items retained since his employment
ended and used during it. but it has not formally made an Employer’s Contract Claim
5.The claimant originally put no figures to his individual claims. He was asked to do so
and by email of 22 January said he was owed deferred and reduced wages for the
months January to May 2018 and loans made to the company by him as director have
not been repaid.On 29 January the respondent disputed the amount of the directors
loan and other elements .On 5 February 2019 the claimant replied.
6. At or shortly after dismissal he was paid £10414 which the respondent says was its
calculation of his redundancy payment. The claimant argues he can treat that as
reducing any of the debts he is owed. When I explained the time limit in the Tribunal
and that his directors loan could not be considered here, he accepted he would be
better to argue all his claims, other than the redundancy payment, in the Courts . If he is
right that the sum he has received cannot be apportioned to the redundancy payment
he may apply to the Secretary of State for payment . Both sides were content with the
terms of this judgment .
TM Garnon Employment Judge
Date signed 6 February 2019
Case Number 2503407/18
3
NOTICE
THE EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (INTEREST) ORDER 1990
Tribunal case number(s): 2503407/2018
Name of
case(s):
Mr S Ratchford v Cablecomm Training Ltd
The Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 provides that sums of money payable
as a result of a judgment of an Employment Tribunal (excluding sums representing
costs or expenses), shall carry interest where the full amount is not paid within 14 days
after the day that the document containing the tribunal’s written judgment is recorded as
having been sent to parties. That day is known as “the relevant decision day”. The
date from which interest starts to accrue is called “the calculation day” and is the day
immediately following the relevant decision day.
The rate of interest payable is that specified in section 17 of the Judgments Act 1838 on
the relevant decision day. This is known as "the stipulated rate of interest" and the rate
applicable in your case is set out below.
The following information in respect of this case is provided by the Secretary of the
Tribunals in accordance with the requirements of Article 12 of the Order:-
"the relevant decision day" is: 13 February 2019
"the calculation day" is: 14 February 2019
"the stipulated rate of interest" is: 8%
MISS K FEATHERSTONE
For the Employment Tribunal Office
Case Number 2503407/18
4
INTEREST ON TRIBUNAL AWARDS
GUIDANCE NOTE
1. This guidance note should be read in conjunction with the booklet, ‘The Judgment’ which
can be found on our website at
www.gov.uk/government/publications/employment-tribunal-hearings-judgment-guidet426
If you do not have access to the internet, paper copies can be obtained by telephoning the
tribunal office dealing with the claim.
2. The Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 provides for interest to be paid
on employment tribunal awards (excluding sums representing costs or expenses) if they
remain wholly or partly unpaid more than 14 days after the date on which the Tribunal’s
judgment is recorded as having been sent to the parties, which is known as “the
relevant decision day”.
3. The date from which interest starts to accrue is the day immediately following the
relevant decision day and is called “the calculation day”. The dates of both the relevant
decision day and the calculation day that apply in your case are recorded on the Notice
attached to the judgment. If you have received a judgment and subsequently request
reasons (see ‘The Judgment’ booklet) the date of the relevant judgment day will remain
unchanged.
4. “Interest” means simple interest accruing from day to day on such part of the sum
of money awarded by the tribunal for the time being remaining unpaid. Interest does
not accrue on deductions such as Tax and/or National Insurance Contributions that are
to be paid to the appropriate authorities. Neither does interest accrue on any sums
which the Secretary of State has claimed in a recoupment notice (see ‘The Judgment’
booklet).
5. Where the sum awarded is varied upon a review of the judgment by the
Employment Tribunal or upon appeal to the Employment Appeal Tribunal or a higher
appellate court, then interest will accrue in the same way (from "the calculation day"),
but on the award as varied by the higher court and not on the sum originally awarded by
the Tribunal.
6. ‘The Judgment’ booklet explains how employment tribunal awards are enforced.
The interest element of an award is enforced in the same way.
Related Parties
Search the database for other cases involving these individuals or companies.