Mrs A Anderson-Krooder v Think Big Global Ltd: 6010052/2025
Employment Tribunal
Published on 22 January 2026, 11:06
- Summary
- Employment Tribunal decision.
- categories
-
redundancy
- country
- england-and-wales
- decision date
- 2025-11-19
Official Documents
-
Mrs A Anderson-Krooder v Think Big Global Ltd: 6010052/2025 - Judgment
Change History
-
First published.
Full Decision Text
Raw text extracted from the official documents.
Case Number: 6010052/2025
1
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Claimant:
Mrs Alana Anderson-Krooder
Respondent:
Think Big Global Limited
JUDGMENT
1.
The claim for a statutory redundancy payment was presented in the Manchester Employment Tribunal on 23 March 2025. The respondent has failed to present a valid response on time.
2.
The claim was submitted outside the time limit in s164(1) of the Employment Rights Act but the claimant has provided sufficient information to demonstrate that it would be just and equitable for her to receive a redundancy payment in accordance with s164(2) and 164(3). The Employment Judge has decided that a determination can properly be made of the claim in accordance with rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
3.
The claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and is entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,087.50 (1 week’s pay for each full year worked 2x 543.60 = £1,087.50)
4.
The respondent must pay the claimant £1,087.50 in total.
Approved by:
Employment Judge Cookson
19 November 2025
Judgment sent to the parties on:
16 December 2025
For the Tribunal:
……………………………
Case Number: 6010052/2025
2
Notes
Reasons for the judgment having been given orally at the hearing, written reasons will not be provided unless a request was made by either party at the hearing or a written request is presented by either party within 14 days of the sending of this written record of the decision. If written reasons are provided they will be placed online.
All judgments (apart from judgments under Rule 51) and any written reasons for the judgments are published, in full, online at https://www.gov.uk/employment-tribunal-decisions shortly after a copy has been sent to the claimants and respondents.
If a Tribunal hearing has been recorded, you may request a transcript of the recording. Unless there are exceptional circumstances, you will have to pay for it. If a transcript is produced it will not include any oral judgment or reasons given at the hearing. The transcript will not be checked, approved or verified by a judge. There is more information in the joint Presidential Practice Direction on the Recording and Transcription of Hearings and accompanying Guidance, which can be found at www.judiciary.uk/guidance-and-resources/employment-rules-and-legislation-practice-directions/
Case Number: 6010052/2025
3
NOTICE
THE EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (INTEREST) ORDER 1990
ARTICLE 12
Case number: 6010052/2025
Name of case:
Mrs Alana Anderson-Krooder
v
Think Big Global Limited
Interest is payable when an Employment Tribunal makes an award or determination requiring one party to proceedings to pay a sum of money to another party, apart from sums representing costs or expenses.
No interest is payable if the sum is paid in full within 14 days after the date the Tribunal sent the written record of the decision to the parties. The date the Tribunal sent the written record of the decision to the parties is called the relevant decision day.
Interest starts to accrue from the day immediately after the relevant decision day. That is called the calculation day.
The rate of interest payable is the rate specified in section 17 of the Judgments Act 1838 on the relevant decision day. This is known as the stipulated rate of interest.
The Secretary of the Tribunal is required to give you notice of the relevant decision day, the calculation day, and the stipulated rate of interest in your case. They are as follows:
the relevant decision day in this case is: 16 December 2025
the calculation day in this case is: 17 December 2025
the stipulated rate of interest is: 8% per annum.
For the Employment Tribunal Office
Related Parties
Search the database for other cases involving these individuals or companies.