Mrs J Stack v Harrison Catering Services Ltd: 2301770/2017
Employment Tribunal
Published on 03 December 2019, 12:30
- Summary
- Employment Tribunal decision.
- categories
-
disability-discrimination unfair-dismissal
- country
- england-and-wales
- decision date
- 2018-01-15
Change History
-
New Judgment
-
First published.
Full Decision Text
Raw text extracted from the official documents.
Case Number:2301770/2017
1
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Claimant Mrs J Stack
Represented by Ms R Senior, FRU
Respondent Harrison Catering Services Limited
Represented by Mr D Smith, Solicitor
Before: Employment Judge K Andrews
Preliminary Hearing held on 7 September 2017 at
London South Employment Tribunal by telephone
JUDGMENT
The claim of disability discrimination is dismissed on withdrawal.
NOTE OF CASE MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION
1. The issues arising in the remaining claim of unfair dismissal are as follows.
2. The respondent admits dismissal but says the reason for that dismissal
was primarily conduct, following an accumulation of disciplinary warnings,
or in the alternative was capability. The claimant says that there was no
potentially fair reason for the dismissal as she was disliked simply because
a new manager had a dislike for her and manufactured a case against her.
She also says that the previous final written warning was not given in good
faith.
3. If there was a potentially fair reason for the disciplinary then the issues
arising under each heading are non-controversial.
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDERS
Schedule of Loss
1 The claimant has served a schedule of loss which will be updated seven
days before the Hearing together with copies of any new supporting
documents.
Case Number:2301770/2017
2
Documents
2 On or before 21 September 2017 the parties shall send to each other a
list of all documents which are or have been in their possession or power
relating to the matters in issue in these proceedings including any
documents relevant to the remedy sought.
3 On or before 5 October 2017 the parties shall provide copies to each
other of any documents requested from their list.
4 On or before 19 October 2017 the respondent shall send to the claimant
a copy of the proposed bundle for the Hearing for the claimant to agree if
possible. If it cannot be agreed the claimant shall indicate her
disagreement and the reasons why on or before 26 October 2017.
5 The bundle shall contain a copy of each document both parties intend to
use at the Hearing, together with a list of contents, with each page
numbered, avoiding duplication and be so bound or otherwise held
together, so as to open flat.
6 The respondent shall bring three identical copies of the bundle to the
Hearing.
7 The parties are encouraged to agree a chronology for use at the
Hearing.
Witness Statements
8 The parties shall prepare a written statement for each witness (including
the claimant or respondent who will give evidence personally) who it is
intended will be called to give evidence on their behalf at the Hearing.
The witness statements shall:
8.1 be typed in double spacing;
8.2 contain the evidence of the witnesses;
8.3 be laid out in short consecutively numbered paragraphs;
8.4 set out in chronological order, with dates, the facts which the
witness can state;
8.5 omit any matter not relevant to the issues in this case;
8.6 identify the source of any information which the witness does not
know first-hand;
8.7 refer by page number in the bundle of documents to any
document mentioned in the statement; and
8.8 be signed.
9 Each party shall ensure that there are four copies of each statement of
their own witnesses available at the Hearing and not contained in the
bundle of documents.
10 No evidence may be given or expanded upon by a witness other than
the evidence contained in the written statement of that witness without
the leave of the Tribunal. No witness may be called by a party to give
evidence at the Hearing unless a written witness statement has been
prepared and exchanged or with the leave of the Tribunal.
Case Number:2301770/2017
3
11 On or before 30 November 2017 each party shall provide to the other
one copy of each witness statement for each of the witnesses that party
intends to call to give evidence at the Hearing. If any party does not
receive the witness statements of another, that party must immediately
inform the Tribunal in writing together with any reason given by that
other.
Hearing Date
12 The Hearing will take place at London South Employment Tribunal,
Montague Ct, 101 London Rd, Croydon, CR0 2RF before a Judge sitting
alone for 2 days commencing on 12 March 2018. No postponement of
this date will be granted unless there are exceptional unforeseen
circumstances.
13 This listing allows for the hearing of liability and general remedy issues
(including any issues arising from Polkey, contributory fault and
application of the ACAS code). It is noted that the claimant does not
expects to call six (as the respondent has here stages to each of its
procedures) but the evidence will be duplicative in parts and not
particularly lengthy. The Tribunal will endeavour to hear the case within
the allocated time. Time restrictions may have to be placed on
questioning of witnesses and on closing speeches if it appears that the
time allocation might be exceeded. The parties are expected to cooperate
to ensure that the case can be completed within the time
allocated.
_________________________________
Employment Judge K Andrews
Dated 7 September 2017
NOTES
1 This Order constitutes a notice of hearing under the Employment
Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. At the Hearing all parties will have
the opportunity to submit written representations and to advance oral
argument. If a party wishes to submit written representations for
consideration to the hearing s/he shall present them to the Employment
Tribunal Office not less than 7 days before the Hearing and shall, at the
same time send a copy to all other parties.
2 Failure to comply with an Order relating to the disclosure or inspection of
documents may result on summary conviction in a fine of up to £1,000
Case Number:2301770/2017
4
being imposed upon a person in default under section 7(4) of the
Employment Tribunals Act 1996.
3 The Tribunal may also make a further Order (an “Unless Order”)
providing that unless it is complied with, the claim or, as the case may
be, the response shall be dismissed without further order.
4 An Order may be varied or revoked upon application by a person
affected by the Order or by an Employment Judge on his or her own
initiative.
5 This Order confirms orders made/directions given at a hearing on 7
September 2017.
6 No further notice of hearing will follow.
Case No: 2301770/2017
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Claimant: Mrs J Stack
Respondent: Harrison Catering Services Ltd
JUDGMENT
The proceedings are dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the
Claimant.
Regional Employment Judge Hildebrand
Date: 15 January 2018
Related Parties
Search the database for other cases involving these individuals or companies.