Mrs S Heslop v Centrex Computing Services Ltd: 2500240/2019
Employment Tribunal
Published on 20 November 2019, 08:08
- Summary
- Employment Tribunal decision.
- categories
-
breach-of-contract unfair-dismissal unlawful-deduction-from-wages
- country
- england-and-wales
- decision date
- 2019-10-11
Official Documents
-
Mrs S Heslop v Centrex Computing Services Ltd: 2500240/2019 - Judgment
Change History
-
First published.
Full Decision Text
Raw text extracted from the official documents.
Case Number: 2500240/2019
1
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Claimant: Mrs S Heslop
Respondent: Centrex Computing Services Limited
Heard at: North Shields On: 8 and 9 October 2019
Before: Employment Judge Deeley
Representation
Claimant: Dr L Sherlock (Counsel)
Respondent: Mr M Heslop (Respondent’s Managing Director)
JUDGMENT
1. The Claimant was not an employee of the Respondent, as defined in s230 of the
Employment Rights Act 1996 (the ERA). Her claims for:
1.1 ordinary unfair dismissal under s94 and s98 of the ERA; and
1.2 breach of contract (wrongful dismissal) under Regulation 3 of the Employment
Tribunals (Extension of Jurisdiction E&W) Order 1994;
therefore fail and are dismissed.
2. The Claimant was a worker of the Respondent, as defined in s230 of the ERA. The
Respondent unlawfully deducted the sums set out below from the Claimant’s wages,
as defined under s13 of the ERA. The Claimant is awarded the sum of £10,400 gross
(to be paid by the Respondent to the Claimant, less all applicable PAYE deductions).
NOTES
3. The Claimant requested written reasons for this judgment at the hearing on 9
October 2019. These shall be provided in due course.
__________________________
Employment Judge Deeley
11 October 2019
Public access to Employment Tribunal judgments
Judgments and written reasons for judgments, where they are provided, are published in full online at
www.gov.uk/employment-tribunal-decisions shortly after a copy has been sent to the parties in the case.
Case Number: 2500240/2019
2
Written reasons
Reasons for the judgment having been given orally at the hearing, written reasons will not be provided
unless a request was made by either party at the hearing or a written request is presented by either party
within 14 days of the sending of this written record of the decision.
Related Parties
Search the database for other cases involving these individuals or companies.