Back to Search

Ms E Smith v Progressive Care Ltd: 1806316/2017

Employment Tribunal

Published on 11 March 2019, 11:11

Summary
Employment Tribunal decision.
categories
disability-discrimination public-interest-disclosure unfair-dismissal unlawful-deduction-from-wages
country
england-and-wales
decision date
2018-06-12

Official Documents

  • Ms E Smith v Progressive Care Ltd: 1806316/2017 - Judgment
  • Ms E Smith v Progressive Care Ltd: 1806316/2017 - Partial Dismissal

Change History

  • Partial Dismissal added.

  • First published.

Full Decision Text

Raw text extracted from the official documents.

Case No: 1806316/2017 1 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Ms E Smith Respondent: Progressive Care Ltd HELD AT: Sheffield ON: 1 May 2018 BEFORE: Employment Judge Rostant REPRESENTATION: Claimant: Respondent: In person Mr T Pochron, Solicitor JUDGMENT The claims of disability discrimination, public interest disclosure and automatic unfair dismissal fail and are dismissed. _____________________________ Employment Judge Rostant Date 04/05/2018 Note - Reasons for the judgment having been given orally at the hearing, written reasons will not be provided unless a request was made by either party at the hearing or a written request is presented by either party within 14 days of the sending of this written record of the decision. Public access to employment tribunal decisions Case No: 1806316/2017 2 Judgments and reasons for the judgments are published, in full, online at www.gov.uk/employmenttribunal- decisions shortly after a copy has been sent to the claimant(s) and respondent(s) in a case. Case Number: 1806316 /2017 1 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant Respondent Ms E Smith v Progressive Care Ltd Heard at: Sheffield On: 8 June 2018 Before: Employment Judge Rostant (sitting alone) Appearance: For the Claimant: In Person For the Respondent: Mr P Wilson of Counsel JUDGMENT The respondent has made an unauthorised deduction from the claimants’ wages in the sum of £18.65 and is ordered to pay that sum to the claimant. Employment Judge Rostant Dated: 12 June 2018 Note Reasons for the judgment having been given orally at the hearing, written reasons will not be provided unless a request was made by either party at the hearing or a written request is presented by either party within 14 days of the sending of this written record of the decision.

Related Parties

Search the database for other cases involving these individuals or companies.