Ms M Broadbent v No Agent Technologies Ltd: 1304321/2018
Employment Tribunal
Published on 28 March 2019, 13:18
- Summary
- Employment Tribunal decision.
- categories
-
breach-of-contract unfair-dismissal
- country
- england-and-wales
- decision date
- 2019-03-14
Change History
-
New Judgment
-
First published.
Full Decision Text
Raw text extracted from the official documents.
Case No: 1304321/2018
1.18 UDL – length of service - strike out judgment -.part claim
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Claimant: Ms M Broadbent
Respondent: No Agent Technologies Ltd
JUDGMENT
The complaint that the claimant was unfairly dismissed is struck out.
REASONS
1. The claimant complains of unfair dismissal.
2. Section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 requires a claimant to have not
less than two years service to make an unfair dismissal complaint.
3. The claimant was employed by the respondent for less than two years.
4. Therefore the claimant is not entitled to bring such a complaint.
5. The claimant has failed to give an acceptable reason, despite being given the
opportunity to do so, why the complaint should not be struck out.
6. Accordingly, the complaint of unfair dismissal is struck out. The claimant’s other
complaints are not affected by this judgment.
________________________
Employment Judge Lloyd
Date: 22/11/2018
Case Number: 1304321/2018
- 1 -
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALSEMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALSEMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Claimant
Respondent
Ms M Broadbent
-v-
No Agent Technologies Ltd
FINAL MERITS FINAL MERITSFINAL MERITSFINAL MERITSFINAL MERITS FINAL MERITS HEARINGEARINGEARING EARING
Heard at:
Centre City Tower, Birmingham
On:
14 March 2019
Before:
Employment Judge Perry (sitting alone)
Appearances
For the Claimant:
no appearance
For the Respondent:
Mr D Peers (Financial Controller)
JUDGMENT JUDGMENT
The claimant having failed to attend, the Tribunal having considered the information available to it both on the tribunal file and having attempted to contact the claimant as to the reason for her absence, the claim is dismissed pursuant to rule 47.
Employment Judge Perry
14 March 2019
Note. Reasons for the judgment having been given orally at the hearing, written reasons will not be provided unless a request was made by either party at the hearing or a written request is presented by either party within 14 days of the sending of this written record of the decision.
Related Parties
Search the database for other cases involving these individuals or companies.